On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 08:25 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > Since all we have is *ONE LINE* of text, it's rather silly to argue > intentions, corporate philosophy, and the fate of the world based on this, > don't you think? If they provided the freedoms required to be Free Software, none of us would be having any trouble, don't you think? But they forbid you the freedom to run the software for any purpose (MACROVISION), they forbid you the freedom to study and modify it to your needs (correct 4k stack compatibility problem), they only allow pristine redistribution for GNU/Linux (no FreeBSD dudes... you're out of luck), and they forbid publishing improved versions. So where do you end now? Rui
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
