On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 19:06, Douglas Furlong wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 11:08, Hugh Foster wrote: > > In order to fit this list better, I have moved my subscription from my > > servisair.com address to this, my home account, the software for which > > can format mail dependent on where it's going. It will cost me, as I > > have to dialup for this rather than use the LAN, but if it keeps the > > peace, it's worth it. > > > > My apologies for the disruption. > I think your sig here is okay, but do you really want to sign off with an apology for disruption? ;) > > I think the main problem is not so much you, just the general attitude > towards Sig's. It's fair (I think) to get upset when reading a list and > having HUGE sigs put on every thing. > > Companies should really try to shorten them, and also have it so that if > posting to a world readable list, then at worst have a sig that just > says this person does not represent the company in their opinion. As > apposed to every thing else. > > I am currently resisting implementing signatures at my company until > they come up with one that is not 500 lines long. > > Doug Let them come up with all the legaleese they want- on a web page linked from a 1-2 line company sig, leaving the other 2-3 lines for the employee. That way everybody is happy. -- Chris Kloiber
