RE: signature.asc files

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: RE: signature.asc files
• From: Douglas Furlong <douglas.furlong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:59:49 +0100
• In-reply-to: <1083077814.1458.229.camel@roque>
• References: <[email protected]> <1083077814.1458.229.camel@roque>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> > RFC's are guidelines, not standards. I have not seeing any software out
> > there that adheres 100% to the RFC's, there are always relaxed
> > interpretations.
> 
> HTTP 1.1 is a standard. Right? Wrong?
> 
> 
> Right! The standard is RFC 2616 IIRC.
>                        ^^^
> 
Just a tiny point, just because some thing has an RFC, and is a
standard, does not mean it's a standard due to the existence of the RFC.

Doug

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: signature.asc files
    • From: Rui Miguel Seabra

• References:
  • RE: signature.asc files
    • From: David Collantes
  • RE: signature.asc files
    • From: Rui Miguel Seabra

• Prev by Date: There is a better way! (was: RE: Hugh's long sig)
• Next by Date: Re: Sendmail and masq
• Previous by thread: RE: signature.asc files
• Next by thread: RE: signature.asc files
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread