> > RFC's are guidelines, not standards. I have not seeing any software out > > there that adheres 100% to the RFC's, there are always relaxed > > interpretations. > > HTTP 1.1 is a standard. Right? Wrong? > > > Right! The standard is RFC 2616 IIRC. > ^^^ > Just a tiny point, just because some thing has an RFC, and is a standard, does not mean it's a standard due to the existence of the RFC. Doug
