> so it's your problem. don't use signed/encrypted messaging :) > > > there is also the isssue of compatibility > > between gpg and different versions of ms windows pgp clients. > > There are RFCs and OpenPGP is a standard, no? Why not complain to the > proprietary or incompatible clients? This is starting to sound like a flame about to spark. Most of the people will not verify gpg signatures, most of the people does not use pgp/gpg. RFC's are guidelines, not standards. I have not seeing any software out there that adheres 100% to the RFC's, there are always relaxed interpretations. I would recommend not to use gpg signed messages on the lists, unless it is something of such vital importance that verifying the sender is a must (not a should). But that is my opinion. I do not mind stripping the gpg/pgp attachments at all. It is done automatically for me, so not worries there. Cheers, -- David Collantes - College of Business Administration, UCF - (407)823-3418 Please do not forward, Cc or Bcc this email to anyone without my consent. This email was meant for you and no one else, unless otherwise specified.
