Am Di, den 27.04.2004 schrieb Jay Daniels um 16:02: > gpg signed messages are sent as attachments by default in mutt. I am no mutt user, but from what I got as response in my previously initiated talk about GPG signing and what I have read about mutt, that is not correct. From the http://www.fefe.de/muttfaq/faq.html "Some user complained that my PGP messages are attachments! That user is using obsolete and broken software. PGP/MIME is the only way to use PGP with email that is actually specified (RFC 2015) and not some proprietary ad-hoc crap. Tell that other user to get rid of his legacy crap mail software and install standards compliant software. RFC 2015 is from 1996, by the way, so no mail software author can say he didn't have enough time to implement this." Charles Curley already pointed to that FAQ on 1. April in the former thread "GPG signatures and list mail". And you can easily see he is mailing using mutt: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i and his GPG signature appears correct in my client. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl Sirendipity 16:47:24 up 15:36, 11 users, 0.18, 0.19, 0.23 [ ÎÎÏÎÎ Ï'ÎÏÏÎÎ - gnothi seauton ] my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
