I've noticed that on the Archives, it says that my messages are possible follow-ups. They do end up top-posted within a thread, but luckily are not made into new threads (except for one, which was a reply to a very old message). I'll try switching it to Mime if/when I have time to fool around with that. --- "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would appear that on Apr 5, Brian Bober did say: > > > --- "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I'm using Yahoo Mail. All my computers are in constant flux > > right now (I'm rebuilding systems, etc), so I can't rely on any mail client > > being there from day one to the next. Even though I pay for the pop > abilities > > for Yahoo mail, I can't use them atm for that reason. > > > > I think if people CC me like you did and I reply to that CC, that it'll > work > > properly, but I'm not sure. I'll CC myself so I can look at my headers. > > > > There was an option to get the digest in MIME type. I chose plaintext. > Maybe > > that's the problem.. I don't get the individual messages as attachments, > but I > > just get one long email. > > AhHa, that might be part of it. (I forgot the plain text version was > available) > > In that case I don't think you could get GOOD thread followup anyway, So > I think I'd use a NEW message each time rather than a reply. But what do > I know??? > > -- > | --- ___ > | <0> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook > | ^ J(tWdy)P > | ~\___/~ <<jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx>> > > But if I actually knew everything, then I'd know I was an idiot...
