James Ralston said: > On 2004-04-05 at 19:34:27-04 William Hooper <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> James Ralston said: >> >> > > Either a) go with Fedora Legacy or b) convince another third >> > > party to support it (like some are doing for 7.3). >> > >> > Three words: embargoed security vulnerabilities. >> >> One word: Progeny > > Does Progeny know about embargoed security vulnerabilities? From > their web site, I can find no evidence that they do. Well, as a point of reference I don't see any evidence on Red Hat's website to say they know about embargoed security vulnerabilities, but I might just be missing it. I would suggest info@xxxxxxxxxxx be your course of action. [snip] >> Consider the schedule for FC2 has been public for a while and Red >> Hat isn't jumping to extend EOL. > > Ah, but remember, the schedule slipped. If the original schedule had > held, FC2 would be out before RHL9 went EOL, and I wouldn't have made > this request to begin with. I think you read too much into the fact that Fedora's schedule happened to overlap with Red Hat's. -- William Hooper
