*sigh* see my previous post, i dont care what the headers say, i dont even read most the posts on here cause the signal to noise ratio is excesive with ppl like you adding to it. I spose the days just prior to xmas where this list was sending only half of everbodies posts was my fault as well :) anyway i repeat, the care factor is non existant. life goes on. On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Mo, den 05.04.2004 schrieb Res um 23:08: > > > point out to me the original post on this thread, do it with full > > reference to the list archives, in fact I invite you to sent me the entire > > thread GUMBY GRUB and show WHERE i did NOT start it. > > Received: from roswell.ausics.net (roswell.ausics.net [203.220.55.150]) > by valhalla.ausics.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id > i339IaAV010286 for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 > 19:18:37 +1000 > Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 19:18:28 +1000 (EST) > From: Res <res@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: GUMBY GRUB > In-reply-to: <406E743A.7090503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sender: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Errors-to: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > Reply to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404031914130.5232@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > MIME-version: 1.0 > Precedence: junk > X-Loop: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > X-BeenThere: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > X-Valhalla-MailScanner: This message was found to be clean of known > virus's > X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.567 > X-Spam-Status: seams to be clean: hits=-4.901 required=5 tests=BAYES_00 > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on Metatron > References: <1080977062.2597.4.camel@hostserver> > <406E743A.7090503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > So, your initial posting contained not only the "In-reply-to" header tag > but too the "References" tag. I do not know how much you know about > mail, but what do you think does the "References" stay for and come > from? I can answer you: as you did a reply mail and no freshly new one. > > Alexander > > > -- Regards, Res
