On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 22:18, jludwig wrote: > Actually I'm not using any filters since my ISP filters are very > effective -- at least for spam. This also allows for a tighter firewall > since I am removed from my mail server. I use Evo's filters to move incoming e-mails to specific sub-folders within my Inbox to organize e-mails from the many lists that I subscribe to as well as based upon one of two e-mail accounts that I have. I use SpamAssassin to filter spam and e-mails containing MS executable file types (after having modified the SA user_prefs file to score these properly). This takes care of 99.9% of the stuff and only rarely do I have to train SA. E-mails tagged in this fashion are moved directly to the Trash folder. > What you have indicted, though, is that you are not receiving doubles. That is correct. > This would indicate that my ISP <comcast.net) has at least one broken > filter, or, that I need to implement at least one filter. Could be. There were times during the past worm attacks that my ISP's mail servers slowed notably due to the high traffic volumes. During those times, even though I had downloaded e-mails (and I do not keep copies on the server), the e-mails would download multiple times because the servers would not update to show that they had already been downloaded. I would have to go to the web e-mail interface and delete the e-mails that way to clear the folders. I have not had that problem in some time though as my ISP has put other filtering mechanisms in place to curtail the traffic volume. HTH, Marc Schwartz
