Aaron Matteson became daring and sent these 2.0K bytes, > T. Ribbrock became daring and sent these 0.9K bytes, > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:00:53AM -0500, Thomas Ratliff wrote: > > [...] > > > I'd also recommend RFC 1855 <http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html>, which > > > explains basic netiquette, especially the part on "one-to-many" communications. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > May I remind you that RFC1855 also recommends to make sure your lines > > aren't longer than 65 characters? Personally, I find 65 a bit short - > > something between 72 and 76 usually works well - but your lines are > > definitely too long... > > i am aware of the rfc, but as you may/maynot be aware, all the rest of > the lines are to spec, but sometimes vi does not get along well with > going back and amending the text without throwing the formatting out of > wack, i assure you i will take the neccessary steps in the future to > correct such a mishap. Thanks you for bringing this to my attention. > Might i impose upon you to check if there is also an rfc for runon > sentences? Thanks in advance. lol, sorry didn't follow the thread and though that was directed at me. Sorry for the mixup :) -- 0 1 0 Aaron M Matteson - http://cryptosystem.us 0 0 1 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, 1 1 1 it should be hard to understand! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ Please do not send me HTML emails or attachments containing ( ) Microsoft Word documents, Excel documents or Access sheets as X they will be automatically forwarded to a mailbox i check / \ far less frequently. Thanks.
