On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 09:17, T. Ribbrock wrote: > > FC1 is much more reliable and stable than RH8 ever dreamed it could > > be. And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days > > as well. > > Huh? 4.2, 5.2 and 6.2 were excellent releases wrt stability - that's > exactly where the old "only use the x.2s from RH!" addage came from. 7.2 > was an exception but was improved on by 7.3 (which fits nicely into the > row above). Lord! That's exactly my point. The older releases needed to get to x.2 before they were stable while FC1 is almost there now. I expect FC2 to be even better. Next time read before you reply. -- Kuramarujo - http://www.webtrek.com/~klemmerj/sumo.html
