Re: RH now exiting 1 more data center

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    yes i am to and even tho i agree with your answere i respect it . i know nothing of slackware so i supose wre even lil
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 18:36, Res wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:

>     sometimes other than security ...you may not need an upgrade . my
> fedora box has been ruining since the release . i will do a complete
> new  install when fc 2 stable comes out . if your maintaining that many
> computers  . id go get red hat enterprise .    unless its a cheap
> company .

The fact of the matter is the RH9 and slackware boxes have no problems.
I can not afford to keep a fedora box online just to see its next crash
and debug it, our clients expect a working reliable service, they get it
off slackware and they get it off RH9, we will use what works for minimal
inconvenience to our clients, I said  initially it was a sad day RH went
this way and this proves it,  only 2 fedora boxes, they both F up after
around the same time, they both need to be rebooted daily ( fuck me, if i
want to reboot a machine daily  ill install windows ) its beyond a joke
and is taking up engineeers time when they could be doing beter things.


>    then just let us know what happen and we can QA it . unless you dont
> know what your doing   .  if u need to flam me do it off the board

no i prolly dont, after all ive only been with RH since 6 months after
they first kicked off, with with slackware for 10 years, solaris, hpux
digital. ur right im a clueless fuckin idiot.
much like you id say.


> .                      On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 17:30, Res wrote:
>
> > Well ive listened to the other bashers and those ones who think Fedora
> > will be better than the RH we knew....I maintain about 40 slackware
> > boxes, 2 fedora and 3 RH9. since the last round of updates the 2 fedora
> > boxes have died several times without reason, total lockup on kernel
> > panics. the other boxes incl rh9 just chug away like they are not even
> > there, because  RH 9 will cease to get supporot in 2 months, i will be
> > going into the data center today to piss off the 2 fedora boxes and
> > replace them with slackware, and sadly,in a couple months or whenever i
> > get sick ofmanually making and applying updates, the 2 RH9 boxes will go
> > to slackware as well... I find it unacceptable that fedora is now the
> > winblow$ on the linux world., as I and numerous
> > other loyal RH's since almost day one saw this lack of QC with these
> > fedora changes, I am not at all suprised.
> >
> > I do not know what checking process is in place now with this 'open co
> > munity' bullshit but its F'in pathetic QC compared to the old.
> >
> >
>

-- 
Regards,
Res

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux