On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:46:18AM -0500, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Watch out for atrpms dependency problems if you include that one. Axel > Thimm has a lot of good stuff, but seems to have something of a "my way > or the highway" attitude about dependencies. Hm, am I really making such an arrogant impression on you? ;) FWIW some concerns about dependencies (like atrpms-.*rpm containing the recomended configuration files for apt/yum) have been dealt with (split out). In fact ATrpms' build system has been refined to only create dependencies on kmdl and perl helper modules, i.e. dependencies are currently extremly minimal. (Note that this applies to packages build after some date around new year) > In my experience fedora.us, stable, and livna do not play nicely > with the "freshrpms group", or vice versa. Be careful what you > throw into the mix. "Too many (rpm) cooks spoil the (Fedora) > broth." But that's no surprise I guess. That is by fedora.us/livna design. > [at-stable] > name=ATrpms for Fedora Core 1 stable > baseurl=http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de/fedora/1/en/i386/at-stable > > #[at-good] > #name=ATrpms for Fedora Core 1 good > #baseurl=http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de/fedora/1/en/i386/at-good > > #[at-testing] > #name=ATrpms for Fedora Core 1 testing > #baseurl=http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de/fedora/1/en/i386/at-testing > > #[at-bleeding] > #name=ATrpms for Fedora Core 1 bleeding > #baseurl=http://apt.physik.fu-berlin.de/fedora/1/en/i386/at-bleeding Note that you only need one entry of the above (e.g. bleeding contains testing, testing contains good, good contains stable). The currently recommended setting is testing BTW, stable and good are rather underpopulated. I am possibly a bit over-conservative. ;) -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpWKDDoLst9M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
