On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:59:01 -0500 (EST), William Hooper wrote: > >> Bart Martens said: > >> > No, "testing" is not the place for security updates. When the security > >> > updates are released for rh9, the security updates for fc1 should > >> > already have gone through "testing", and be released to the public. > >> > >> Red Hat is part of a number of non-public groups that discus and fix > >> security issues. Releasing an update into testing before the issue was > >> made public would be irresponsible. > > > > Doesn't apply to Gaim > > "Gaim" itself is not the issue. The issue is [...] My reply refers to Gaim. And with that, I'm out of his thread. This topic has been discussed elsewhere, too, and I'd like answers to questions, not endless discussion. ;) --
