Bevan C. Bennett wrote:
WipeOut wrote:
I have just been looking at the RHEL versions and the WS basic version is not too badly priced, especially for us as a startup, but we would want to use it for our servers.. :)
Is anyone familiar with this product?? Can it be used for web/email servers or is it restricted in some way?
Have you read their "which to choose" pages at: http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/comparison/
WS is, of course, short for 'Workstation', and is supposed to be for desktop systems.
ES (enterprise server) is geared towards small departmental servers like you describe.
The biggest differences according to the chart referenced above appear to be:
* ES includes amanda-server, arptables_jf, bind, caching-nameserver, dhcp, freeradius, inews, inn, krb5-server, netdump-server, openldap-servers, pxe, quagga, radvd, rarpd, redhat-config-bind, redhat-config-netboot, tftp-server, tux, vsftpd, ypserv, while WS does not. (both have apache).
* ES has no 'premium edition'
* ES does not support 64-bit systems or >8GB of memory on x86
Their footnote for the first difference says:
"Red Hat Enterprise Linux products are based on the same core kernel, libraries and utilities, and also share the same major package sets. However, because Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS is not designed for use in server environments, there are some differences between family members in terms of their server package sets."
I realise that "WS" is for "Workstation" but thay also mention that is the one to use for clusters so I figured that there must be some server aspect to it..
As for "ES", Yes I understand its the one to use for departmental servers but I am trying to cut costs, and I need 3 servers for our new business.. ES is just too expensive..
Looks like its back to Fedora and trying to manage the upgarde cycle.. :(
Later..
