On Sep 23, 2003, Paul Gear <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My point was that some people need a longer release cycle without support. You mean, without Security Errata? Or is that some kind of support you would want for the longer release cycle? Do you realize that, the longer the cycle, the more it costs to keep applying security errata to old releases? Who's going to pay for that cost? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
