Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6
From: Alan Peery <peery@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:08:49 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030916

Mike A. Harris wrote:

I never said media that passes an md5sum is bad. Please point out where I said that.

You didn't. My fractured English was meant to say that md5sums computed are indentical to the MD5SUMS file, so the bytes are correct in the files.

If your images/CDs/whatever *DO* match our official images, then that isn't the problem - and that is what I was asking you for.

They do match.

Can you reproduce it with a real OS install on real hardware not using VMware?

I'll burn these same .iso files to CDROM, and then try and load with them after swapping hard drives. Alas, the laptop with XP cannot be reinstalled at this point.

Alan

References:
- Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6
  - From: Jack Aboutboul
- Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6
  - From: Mike A. Harris
- Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6
  - From: Alan Peery
- Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6
  - From: Mike A. Harris

Prev by Date: distribution and update conventions and methods
Next by Date: mount --bind
Previous by thread: Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6
Next by thread: Re: missing RPM in desktop install -- xsri-2.1.0-6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]