On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 12:15, Jeff Lasman wrote: > > What we need is continued vulnerability-patching for core releases for a > long time. While that might seem to make us primary candidates for the > RHEL versions, with cabinets with 50 servers apiece and annual > subscription charges that model will never work for us. > > So far I've seen nothing on continued vulnerability-patching for RHL > 7.3, or for RH9. If there is any, it appears to be well-hidden, and if > you know of any, please tell me. > See: http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy
