-----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of griffisb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 11:17 PM To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: RE: Fedora and the System Administrator -- are my assumptions onSuSE incorrect? > > Thanks, Bruce. > > Thanks again, > > Buck ========= Nah - LUG would be a Linux User's Group - although the IBM might be a LUG, too -lol. Anyway- have you tried (er, ahem) Red Hat 9.0? You can download the ISO's and burn them to CD. Since Fedora is based on RH Consumer's Version, 9.0 might be a good place to start. I'm seriously thinking about kicking myself in that direction. I need to load up a laptop for my sister and mail it out to her. I was thinking of using Fedora, but was kindly and gently reminded that Fedora is beta - so I'll probably install RH, then go to Fedora when I visit her. ========= Strangely enough, I have RH 9 on the "LUG" (Thanks for updating me on what it really is, LOL). I have it successfully running as a file server on a windows network. Its my test puter so I want to try out several versions to see how easy they are to install and operate. I am not doing so terribly well, I think I am spinning my wheels. If it weren't for the shake-up with RH I would have been spending more time studying and less time on the list and downloading 6GB of SuSE. =========== I'm not one to talk about trying RH. I haven't tried it yet - but it is on my short list. I've tried 3 other distributions and have combed through the "Running Linux 4th Edition" and "Multitool Linux" books. I downloaded the RH9.0 ISO's, but will probably just buy a boxed set so I can include a user's guide when I ship the laptop to my Sis. =========== >From what I have seen and heard, RHL was the best. It saddens me to see RH do this, but what can I say? Well, good luck to you. Buck -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
