Hola, On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:55, Ben Steeves wrote: > Argh, what a terrible change from a usability point of view. I know > this is common in old X window managers (is there really such thing as a > "default" UNIX window manager? :-), but just 'cos that's the way it was > always done doesn't make it right. > > At the very least it should be an option. Click-to-focus isn't the same > behaviour because the click that focuses also raises. I *hate* that. I > want to have the rear window have focus without coming to the front, and > without fancy combinations of clicking and alt-tabbing around. I do agree with you that it should be an option. I must say though that this change delighted me, and is Correct (tm). ;-) *dons the suit* -- Merc zenmerc@xxxxxxxxxxx Yeah.
