On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 14:27, Ian Mortimer wrote: > > o Package Changes (packages that have been added/deleted/deprecated) > > Helpful here is a brief explanation of why a package has been deleted/ > deprecated. > > > Some differing approaches come to mind: > > > > o Make it all package based > > ... > > What about basing it on the package groups in comps.xml. This seems like a pretty good idea. Include a summary of the package changes for each "group". Plenty of opportunity for detail, without being needlessly detailed.
