On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 13:23, Felix Miata wrote: > Robert Marcano wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 12:36, Andy Green wrote: > > > > On Friday 14 November 2003 16:17, Robert Marcano wrote: > > > > > I correct my previous post, i am able to use 1280x1024 but nothing > > > > between 1024x768 and 1280x1024 (1280x1024 has a slow refresh rate on > > > > this monitor, but at 1152x870 is unnoticeable) > > > > unnoticeable... ie, doesn't work? > > > I mean than on RH9 it worked and that the slow refresh rate was > > unnoticeable (sorry for my bad English) > > > > > I tried adding ModeLines but it didn't works > > > > > (II) I810(0): Not using mode "1152x870" (no mode of this name) > > > > My guess is this is telling you what you need to know... XF86 can't see your > > > modeline by the look of things. > > > > Where did you put the modeline statement and what does it say? > > > Section "Monitor" > > Identifier "Monitor0" > > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > > ModelName "IBM P70" > > DisplaySize 330 240 > > HorizSync 29.0 - 82.0 > > VertRefresh 50.0 - 120.0 > > Option "dpms" > > UseModes "P70Modes" > > EndSection > > > Section "Modes" > > Identifier "P70Modes" > > Modeline "1152x870" 78.09 1152 1168 1384 1568 870 870 878 909 > > #Modeline "1152x870" 84.52 1152 1168 1384 1568 870 870 878 909 > > EndSection > > I've never seen 1152x870 on any system. Standard aspect is 4/3. That's > what 1024x768, 800x600, 640x480, 1400x1050 and 1600x1200 are. 1280x1024 > is a bastard child 5/4 ratio. 1152 wide should be 864 high, which is one > option on some of my systems. Have you tried 1152x864? How about > 1280x960, which is also 4/3? Yes I tried them using the redhat-config-xfree program, it didn't work. I began to try with 1152x870 because the monitor notifies about this capability to xfree, not 1152x864 that if i remember correctly was the option on RH9 that I was using
