Robert Marcano wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 12:36, Andy Green wrote:
> > On Friday 14 November 2003 16:17, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > > I correct my previous post, i am able to use 1280x1024 but nothing
> > > between 1024x768 and 1280x1024 (1280x1024 has a slow refresh rate on
> > > this monitor, but at 1152x870 is unnoticeable)
> > unnoticeable... ie, doesn't work?
> I mean than on RH9 it worked and that the slow refresh rate was
> unnoticeable (sorry for my bad English)
> > > I tried adding ModeLines but it didn't works
> > > (II) I810(0): Not using mode "1152x870" (no mode of this name)
> > My guess is this is telling you what you need to know... XF86 can't see your
> > modeline by the look of things.
> > Where did you put the modeline statement and what does it say?
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "Monitor0"
> VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
> ModelName "IBM P70"
> DisplaySize 330 240
> HorizSync 29.0 - 82.0
> VertRefresh 50.0 - 120.0
> Option "dpms"
> UseModes "P70Modes"
> EndSection
> Section "Modes"
> Identifier "P70Modes"
> Modeline "1152x870" 78.09 1152 1168 1384 1568 870 870 878 909
> #Modeline "1152x870" 84.52 1152 1168 1384 1568 870 870 878 909
> EndSection
I've never seen 1152x870 on any system. Standard aspect is 4/3. That's
what 1024x768, 800x600, 640x480, 1400x1050 and 1600x1200 are. 1280x1024
is a bastard child 5/4 ratio. 1152 wide should be 864 high, which is one
option on some of my systems. Have you tried 1152x864? How about
1280x960, which is also 4/3?
--
"God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble."
1 Peter 5:5 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
