-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:10 pm, Markku Kolkka wrote: > Neil B. Cohen kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Maanantai 10. > > Marraskuuta 2003 00:01): > > I see that yum > > exists on my Fedora system but apt (or apt-get) does not. Can > > someone tell me if I need to use either or both of these in > > addition to up2date? Instead of up2date? > > No, the new up2date version can access both yum and apt format > repositories. > > > What repositories should I be pointing > > to for yum or apt-get? Is the standard configuration acceptable? > > It keeps your Fedora Core packages updated, but not any extra or > third-party packages. this brings up a question... I'm building a Fedora system that was previous SuSE. Is there an equivalent to RHN? I always nice to have an idicator showing when an update is ready rather than continuously checking with cron. Mike W - -- Registered Linux - 256979 (http://counter.il.org for more information) NRA Life ARS: W0TMW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/rtvT5fq6h2uDDlQRAmR5AKDsT3P141t6vQSl7iwty1EfgVAeOQCgiOhR Fw8YCvcFeXDfO/szrEaxPvk= =iHfR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
