On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 21:02, Mike Burger wrote: > Might want to take a look at the work they've been doing over at > oss.sgi.com, then...they've been putting XFS into 2.4 for quite some time. I use XFS in _all_ my production servers and desktops since ages. My comment was related to "why use ugly patches now, when we can use a vanilla implementation in the next release with 2.6" from the point of view of a developer or a maintainer. If it were trivial to maintain or if a massive amount of people were asking for urgent XFS support, it would became standard install since RHL 8. -- Fabian Arias fabian@xxxxxxxx http://www.dewback.cl/
