On Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:24:55 -0500, Lorenzo Prince wrote: > Hi. I am testing to see if my pgp signing is more readable now. > If this doesn't work, please give me some pointers on how I can fix Mutt > so that it signs messages in a fashion that is readable by everyone. Unfortunately I don't see any signature at all, however it's more my problem than yours. I'm accessing the ML through the GMame gateway (news.gmame.org:119), since I much prefer Usenet to mailing lists, and it looks like they're filtering attachments (such as your GPG sig). My loss I suppose. Still, thought you should know. The headers of your message does show: "Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=5vNYLRcllDrimb99" But the attachment has been striped. I tend to use GPG sigs only for official announcements and such, and prefer to inline clearsign only the relevant section of the message like this: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ANNOUNCE: New beta package Pan 0.14.2.90.0.fdr.1 URL: http://www.genesis-x.nildram.co.uk/apt/fedora/1/i386/RPMS.testing/ RPM: pan-0.14.2.90-0.fdr.1.i386.rpm SIZE: 1198682b MD5SUM: f5d1a77226e2afb1d8b9336f4a072f60 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/7ZaU2XoLj+pGfn8RAksQAJ9osTE+Ij0a0tt6gtGKcojNVZWzrACeJvGQ DF5TSXTzrvKaphRTznuwWEw= =Gpaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Not being able to view this message (my message) through every single Email/News client out there, I have no idea how readable the above is. I guess, like you, I just have to wait until someone complains ;) - Keith
