No, you're right. I shouldn't have said that. I plead a bad hair day and apologize. ;-) Perhaps RHLP or a related project could pick up for a second year of errata. I suppose testing is harder than the actual back-porting/patching. As has been said, it really is going to take a free (as in beer) desktop alternative with more than 12 months of support to take on Windows on the corporate desktop most effectively. -Steve On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 19:43, William Hooper wrote: > Steve Bergman said: > > It obviously made sense to RedHat when RedHat was a company of ~100 > > employees. But it does not make sense now that RedHat is a larger > > company of over 600 employees. > > A lot of things that made sense during the dot-com bubble don't make sense > now... > > Looks like this is turning into a flame war. I'm not part of Red Hat's > decision making process, so I can't help you with what motivates them to > do what they do. I was just giving an alternative view to "Red Hat needs > to give us no cost software supported forever..."
