Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86_64: Use generic percpu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> Also for such changes .text size comparisons before/after are a good 
>>> idea.
>> x86_64-defconfig:
>>
>> pre-percpu                          post-percpu
>>       159373 .init.text                       +3 .init.text
>>      1411137 .rodata                          +8 .rodata
>>      3629056 .text                           +48 .text
>>      7057383 Total                           +59 Total
> 
> ok, that looks like really minimal impact, so i'm in favor of merging 
> this into arch/x86 - and the unification it does later on is nice too.
> 
> to get more test feedback: what would be the best way to get this tested 
> in x86.git in a standalone way? Can i just pick up these 10 patches and 
> remove all the non-x86 arch changes, and expect it to work - or are the 
> other percpu preparatory/cleanup patches in -mm needed too?
> 
> 	Ingo

I've tested some x86_64 configs but the UP model is currently broken so I
haven't been able to test that. (the "fs/nfs/super.c" build problem with
TASK_NORMAL and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE undefined.)

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux