Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Friday 28 December 2007 23:05:05 Mike Travis wrote:
>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> On Friday 28 December 2007 01:10:51 [email protected] wrote:
>>>> x86_64 provides an optimized way to determine the local per cpu area
>>>> offset through the pda and determines the base by accessing a remote
>>>> pda.
>>> And? The rationale for this patch seems to be incomplete.
>>>
>>> As far as I can figure out you're replacing an optimized percpu
>>> implementation which a dumber generic one. Which needs
>>> at least some description why.
>> The specific intent for the next wave of changes coming are to reduce
> [...] That should be in the changelog of the patch.
>
> Anyways the difference between the x86 percpu.h and the generic one is
> that x86-64 uses a short cut through the PDA to get the current cpu
> offset for the current CPU case. The generic one goes through
> smp_processor_id()->array reference instead.
>
> I would request that this optimization is not being removed
> without suitable replacement in the same patchkit.
>
> -Andi
I'll take a closer look at this, but it may have to wait until Christoph
is back this Wednesday.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
