Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 06:22:41PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >Ok, that's a different argument than before. Ok. Although it's
> >only a few bytes. 
> >
> >I would lobby for any message at least contain the suggestion to try
> >edd=off. That could save users a lot of time.
> 
> The important thing is that there is a message before and after.  The 
> rest can be dealt with by Google on in documentation.  That's what the 

That means every user needs to waste at least 5 minutes to google/read
docs and be annoyed by someone's ads. Collective waste.

Just adding "Try edd=off if this hangs"  is ~23 bytes  and adding
that should be hardly a problem even in your 32k. Or perhaps if you're more
worried about code size than grammer "edd=off when hang" @)

-Andi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux