Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Those don't live in an area of memory which is hard-limited to 32K.

Why not 64k?

Ok, that's a different argument than before. Ok. Although it's
only a few bytes. 

I would lobby for any message at least contain the suggestion to try
edd=off. That could save users a lot of time.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux