Re: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
Those don't live in an area of memory which is hard-limited to 32K.

Why not 64k?


Because the bootloader needs some memory in the same segment that it controls. Furthermore, since there were some residual uses of the 0x9000 segment (now removed, but not all bootloaders could be easily fixed), we were limited to about 40K for everything.

Unfortunately we already have the problem that some bootloaders (notably LOADLIN and mknbi) hardcoded an arbitrary limit which was even smaller than that (about 16K, which we're already pushing up against.)

Ok, that's a different argument than before. Ok. Although it's
only a few bytes.
I would lobby for any message at least contain the suggestion to try
edd=off. That could save users a lot of time.

The important thing is that there is a message before and after. The rest can be dealt with by Google on in documentation. That's what the patch currently in x86setup.git does.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux