Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:47:39AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:

 arch/*/kvm/   arch dependent kvm code
Maybe arch/*/virt/ ? No need to add an own directory for each hypervisor.

There will be several kvm files in that directory for x86. If you have just one file, I guess arch/*/virt/kvm.c is okay.
In that case, even arch/*/{mm,kernel}/kvm.c would work fine, as long as you
only want to support one hypervisor, or a small set of small files, there
is no need to have even have a virt directory.

However, if you want to have symmetry across the architectures, I think
arch/*/kvm/ works out best, along the lines of arch/*/{perfmon,crypto,xen,power}. Neither of these is particularly large,
but arch/* is typically not that crowded either.
In the case of x86, we'll have 16 arch dependent files (i8259.[ch],
irq.[ch], lapic.c, mmu.c, paging_tmpl.[ch], svm.[ch], vmx.[ch],
x86.[ch], x86_emulate.[ch]) which warrant a kvm/ subdirectory IMO.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux