Avi Kivity wrote:
In the case of x86, we'll have 16 arch dependent files (i8259.[ch], irq.[ch], lapic.c, mmu.c, paging_tmpl.[ch], svm.[ch], vmx.[ch], x86.[ch], x86_emulate.[ch]) which warrant a kvm/ subdirectory IMO.I think a subdirectory makes sense too. We'll end up with more than a single file.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
- Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
- Next by Date: Re: [crash] kernel BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1060!
- Previous by thread: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- Index(es):
 |