Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi all! On Mo, 10 Dez 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:How reproducable is this? You make it sound like its easy to reproduce,I tried and re-tried and re-tried to reproduce this, without success.Sorry.I guess we can forget that one and assume that it was a strange coincidence. Sorry for the noise.
There were some similar reports a while back, so this may not be noise. Please report if it happens again.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: Norbert Preining <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: Norbert Preining <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: Norbert Preining <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- From: Norbert Preining <[email protected]>
- kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- Prev by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
- Next by Date: [PATCH] i386: hard_{en,dis}able_TSC can be static
- Previous by thread: Re: kernel BUG: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative!
- Next by thread: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Return correct #SGEs for SRQ
- Index(es):
 |