Re: git guidance

On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 07:56:21 +0300, Al Boldi said:

> It probably goes without saying, that gitfs should have some basic 
> configuration file to setup its transparent behaviour

But then it's not *truly* transparent, is it?

And that leaves another question - if you make a config file that excludes
all the .o files - then what's backing the .o files?  Those data blocks need
to be *someplace*.  Maybe you can do something ugly like use unionfs to
combine your gitfs with something else to store the other files...

But at that point, you're probably better off just creating a properly
designed versioning filesystem.

Attachment: pgphVgfYnmso0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Jing Xue <[email protected]>
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: git guidance
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3 can't see sd partitions on Alpha
• Next by Date: Re: x86_64 dynticks not working prev: cpuidle, dynticks compatible or no?
• Previous by thread: Re: git guidance
• Next by thread: Re: git guidance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]