On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:04:48 +0300, Al Boldi said: > Because WORKFLOW C is transparent, it won't affect other workflows. So you > could still use your normal WORKFLOW B in addition to WORKFLOW C, gaining an > additional level of version control detail at no extra cost other than the > git-engine scratch repository overhead. > > BTW, is git efficient enough to handle WORKFLOW C? Imagine the number of commits a 'make clean; make' will do in a kernel tree, as it commits all those .o files... :)
Attachment:
pgpbxACVezu5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: git guidance
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- From: Luke Lu <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- References:
- Re: git guidance
- From: Jing Xue <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- From: Jakub Narebski <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: git guidance
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3 can't see sd partitions on Alpha
- Previous by thread: Re: git guidance
- Next by thread: Re: git guidance
- Index(es):