> Thanks Andi -- I just tested open_exec() w/O_LARGEFILE on an > i386 with a 2.5GB+ binary (mostly debuginfo), and it works as > expected. Interesting to note that the test binary couldn't > be compiled with i386 gcc, but it could be built with x86_64 > gcc -m32. I guess the i386 binutils or gcc don't use O_LARGEFILE. They probably just need to be rebuilt with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Andi > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
- [NEW-PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [NEW-PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- Prev by Date: Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
- Next by Date: Re: NFS Killable tasks request comments on patch
- Previous by thread: Re: [NEW-PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- Next by thread: [PATCH] esp_scsi: Fix reset cleanup spinlock recursion
- Index(es):
 |