> I agree in theory. We've only seen instances on 64-bitters... I think that's because gcc does not support the medium/large code models for i386. Although in theory someone could create an executable with a large enough .data. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- References:
- [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- From: Dave Anderson <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- Prev by Date: Re: How to manage shared persistent local caching (FS-Cache) with NFS?
- Next by Date: [bug?] ALSA sound/core/info.c:852: BUG? (root)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] exec: allow > 2GB executables to run on 64-bit systems
- Index(es):
 |