Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"

Ben Greear <[email protected]> writes:

>> Regardless of infringement it is incompatible with a complete network
>> namespace implementation.  Further it sounds like the module you are
>> describing defines a kernel ABI without being merged and hopes that
>> ABI will still be supportable in the future.  Honestly I think doing so
>> is horrible code maintenance policy.
>>
> I don't mind if the ABI changes, so long as I can still use something similar.

It has occurred to me that I am seeing an implication here that may in fact not
exist.

My impression of dev_get_by_xxxx is that the function is only able to be used
sanely when being part of the definition of a kernel/userspace interface.  With
the further assumption on my part that you need to define a new instance of
dev_get_by_xxxx 

It has just occurred to me that it is possible to reuse the SIOCBRADDIF
and SIOCBRDELIF for that same purpose without defining a new kernel/userspace
interface.

What and how are you using dev_get_by_xxx?

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Ben Greear <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/10] sysfs network namespace support
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
    • From: Ben Greear <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: solid state drive access and context switching
• Next by Date: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?
• Previous by thread: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
• Next by thread: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]