Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ingo Oeser <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Saturday 01 December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > maybe, but we'd have to see how often this gets triggered. An OOM is 
> > something that could happen in any overloaded system - while a hung task 
> > is likely due to a kernel bug.
> 
> What about a client using hard mounted NFS shares here? That shouldn't 
> be killed by the OOM killer in that situation, should it?

NFS is a bit weird in this regard - fundamentally everything should be 
interruptible (or at least killable). Wont the TASK_KILLABLE solve these 
problems?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux