Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks

On Saturday 01 December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> maybe, but we'd have to see how often this gets triggered. An OOM is 
> something that could happen in any overloaded system - while a hung task 
> is likely due to a kernel bug.

What about a client using hard mounted NFS shares here? That shouldn't be
killed by the OOM killer in that situation, should it?

Am I missing sth.?


Best Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
  - From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
- Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
  - From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
- Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c section fix
Next by Date: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
Previous by thread: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
Next by thread: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]