On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Janek Kozicki wrote:
Justin Piszcz said: (by the date of Sat, 1 Dec 2007 07:23:41 -0500
(EST))
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc
The purpose is with any new disk its good to write to all the blocks and
let the drive to all of the re-mapping before you put 'real' data on it.
Let it crap out or fail before I put my data on it.
better use badblocks. It writes data, then reads it afterwards:
In this example the data is semi random (quicker than /dev/urandom ;)
badblocks -c 10240 -s -w -t random -v /dev/sdc
--
Janek Kozicki |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Will give this a shot and see if I can reproduce the error, thanks.
The badblocks did not do anything; however, when I built a software raid 5
and the performed a dd:
/usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/zero of=fill_disk bs=1M
I saw this somewhere along the way:
[30189.967531] RAID5 conf printout:
[30189.967576] --- rd:3 wd:3
[30189.967617] disk 0, o:1, dev:sdc1
[30189.967660] disk 1, o:1, dev:sdd1
[30189.967716] disk 2, o:1, dev:sde1
[42332.936615] ata5.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x7000 SErr 0x0 action
0x2 frozen
[42332.936706] ata5.00: spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0
SAct=0x7000 FIS=004040a1:00000800
[42332.936804] ata5.00: cmd 61/08:60:6f:4d:2a/00:00:27:00:00/40 tag 12 cdb
0x0 data 4096 out
[42332.936805] res 40/00:74:0f:49:2a/00:00:27:00:00/40 Emask 0x2
(HSM violation)
[42332.936977] ata5.00: cmd 61/08:68:77:4d:2a/00:00:27:00:00/40 tag 13 cdb
0x0 data 4096 out
[42332.936981] res 40/00:74:0f:49:2a/00:00:27:00:00/40 Emask 0x2
(HSM violation)
[42332.937162] ata5.00: cmd 61/00:70:0f:49:2a/04:00:27:00:00/40 tag 14 cdb
0x0 data 524288 out
[42332.937163] res 40/00:74:0f:49:2a/00:00:27:00:00/40 Emask 0x2
(HSM violation)
[42333.240054] ata5: soft resetting port
[42333.494462] ata5: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
[42333.506592] ata5.00: configured for UDMA/133
[42333.506652] ata5: EH complete
[42333.506741] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] 1465149168 512-byte hardware sectors
(750156 MB)
[42333.506834] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] Write Protect is off
[42333.506887] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[42333.506905] sd 4:0:0:0: [sde] Write cache: enabled, read cache:
enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Next test, I will turn off NCQ and try to make the problem re-occur.
If anyone else has any thoughts here..?
I ran long smart tests on all 3 disks, they all ran successfully.
Perhaps these drives need to be NCQ BLACKLISTED with the P35 chipset?
Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]