On Friday 30 November 2007 04:37:26 pm Rene Herman wrote:
> On 30-11-07 18:04, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > If I have not overseen something, it should be rather obvious that those
> > can all be declared __init...
> > ---------------
> >
> > Declare PNP option parsing functions as __init
> >
> > There are three kind of parse functions provided by PNP acpi/bios:
> > - get current resources
> > - set resources
> > - get possible resources
> > The first two may be needed later at runtime.
> > The possible resource settings should never change dynamically.
> > And even if this would make any sense (I doubt it), the current implementation
> > only parses possible resource settings at early init time:
> > -> declare all the option parsing __init
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]>
>
> Yes. Obviousness aside,
>
> (0) pnpacpi_add_device is only caller of
> ...
I agree this is probably safe in the current implementation.
However, I think the current implementation is just broken because
we can't really handle hotplug of ACPI devices. Specifically, I think
the first TBD in acpi_bus_check_device() should be fleshed out so it
does something like pnpacpi_add_device().
So my dissenting opinion is that this patch would just get reverted
soon anyway when somebody finishes implementing ACPI hotplug, and
therefore it's not worth doing.
Bjorn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]