On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > the first SCHED_RR priority is 1, not 0 - so this call will always fail. Thanks for spotting this bug and rest of your review comments. Here's V4 of the patchset, aimed at improving fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups. Changes since V3 (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119605252303359): - Fix bug in setting SCHED_RR priority for load_balance_monitor thread - Fix coding style related issues - Separate "introduction of lock_doms_cur() API" into a separate patch I have also tested this patchset against your latest git tree as of today morning. Please apply if there are no major concerns. -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch 0/5] sched: group scheduler related patches (V4)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [Patch 5/5] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [Patch 4/5] sched: introduce a mutex and corresponding API to serialize access to doms_cur[] array
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [Patch 3/5 v2] sched: change how cpu load is calculated
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [Patch 3/5 v1] sched: change how cpu load is calculated
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [Patch 2/5] sched: minor fixes for group scheduler
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [Patch 1/5] sched: code cleanup
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 0/5] sched: group scheduler related patches (V4)
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] sched: Group scheduler related patches
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/4] sched: group scheduler related patches (V3)
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [Patch 4/4] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 4/4] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/2] sched: Group scheduler related patches
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] [libata] Set proper ATA UDMA mode for bf548 according to system clock.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: add dirty_highmem option
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch 4/4] sched: Improve fairness of cpu bandwidth allocation for task groups
- Next by thread: [Patch 1/5] sched: code cleanup
- Index(es):
 |