* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]> wrote: > > ok, as long as it's NOP for the CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, we could > > try it. > > Ok ..thx. I was begining to make changes to avoid even the above minor > changes for !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case, but it doesn't look neat, > hence will drop that effort. well please try it nevertheless, if the changes are not a NOP for the !FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case it's harder to determine that they are indeed harmless for the !FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH 0/4] sched: group scheduler related patches (V3)
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/4] sched: group scheduler related patches (V3)
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] sched: Group scheduler related patches
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/2] sched: Group scheduler related patches
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 5/7] LTTng instrumentation mm
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Keep UML Kconfig in sync with x86
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task groups
- Next by thread: [PATCH 0/4] sched: group scheduler related patches (V3)
- Index(es):
 |