* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]> wrote:
> The current load balancing scheme isn't good for group fairness.
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 4
> kernel/sched.c | 292 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> kernel/sched_fair.c | 95 ++++++++++------
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 2
> kernel/sysctl.c | 16 ++
> 5 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
i'm leaning towards making this v2.6.25 material, as it affects the
non-group-scheduling bits too and is rather large. When i tested it,
group scheduling worked pretty well - at least for CPU bound tasks - and
on SMP too. Could we live with what we have for now and defer this patch
to v2.6.25? If not, could you split up this patch in a way to defer all
the FAIR_GROUP_SCHED relevant changes to a separate patch which will not
affect the !FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case at all? That will make the case much
clearer.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
