Re: mmap dirty limits on 32 bit kernels (Was: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs)

["Rob Mueller" <robm@fastmail.fm>]

> That's my personal opinion, and I realize that some of the commercial
> vendors may care about their insane customers' satisfaction, but I'm
> simply not interested in insane users. If they have that much RAM (and
> bought it a few years ago when a 64-bit CPU wasn't an option), they can't
> be poor.

> From our perspective, the main issue is that some of these machines we spent 
quite a bit of money on the big RAM (for it's day) + lots of 15k RPM SCSI 
drives + multi-year support contracts. They're highly IO bound, and barely 
use 10-20% of their old 2.4Ghz Prestonia Xeon CPUs. It's hard to justify 
junking those machines < 5 years.

We have a couple of 6G machines and some 8G machines using PAE. On the 
whole, they actually have been working really well (hmmm, apart from the 
recent dirty pages issue + reiserfs data=journal leaks + inodes in lowmem 
limits)

Rob

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/