On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
I think that we're fairly good about working the regressions in
Adrian/Michal/Rafael's lists but once Linus releases 2.6.x we tend to let
the unsolved ones slide, and we don't pay as much attention to the
regressions which 2.6.x testers report.
Can't we wait until all regressions[0] are fixed before releasing a new
2.6.x? I'd consider regressions a *literal* show stopper, and with this
policy they just have be fixed, nothing would "slide"...
my 2 cents,
Christian.
[0] preferably only reproducible regressions, with responsive reporters.
--
BOFH excuse #380:
Operators killed when huge stack of backup tapes fell over.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
