Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:.notes : { *(.note.*) . = ALIGN(4); LONG(0); LONG(0); LONG(0); } Am I missing something?Oh, I suppose, but I never much liked putting data-definition into the linker script.
I think it should be sparsely used, but stuff like simple end markers is pretty much what it's good for.
The main reason I want to avoid adding another header field is that the header is a finite resource; one of the many poor decisions in its original design was using a 2-byte jump at the top, so address 0x281 is the end of the universe.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- References:
- [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Prev by Date: Re: Patch tags [was writeout stalls in current -git]
- Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Index(es):